FORUM CLASSIFIEDS DIFFLOCK.com Links & Networks
Forum Homepage
Log in
Profile
Search
Private Messages
Forum Members
Register
Classified Ads
Search Ads
Place New Ad
My ads
Place your classified
ads here for FREE
NB: Adverts placed in the general
forum areas will be deleted
Difflock Homepage
Online Shop
Contact Us
FAQ
Calendar
Garage
Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Advertise With Us - Reach your target market by advertising on the Difflock.com forum.
Click here or call 0845 125 9407


hydrogen
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Difflock Forum Index -> LPG, Bio Diesel and Alternative Fuels
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nivaman
Articulating


Joined: 24 May 2006
Odometer: 929
Location: New Zealand



PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:05 pm    Post subject: hydrogen Reply with quote

has anybody played about with hydrogen?.
in a diesel or petrol engine, what were your findings?.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
floyd fan
Just got MTs


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Odometer: 109
Location: Location:Location:



PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am just in the process of building a hydrogen booster, I'll let you know how things turn out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray_Jnr
Banned!


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Odometer: 4671
Location: The Northeast


1987 Land Rover 90 TD

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i am also in the process of building a hidrogen generator to fit to my 300tdi
__________________________________
Founder of the Difflock Ginger Goatee Club!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
diff22000
Neil Diamond lookalike


Joined: 30 Jun 2002
Odometer: 9291
Location: Luton Beds



PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saitan_jnr wrote:
i am also in the process of building a hidrogen generator to fit to my 300tdi


How does it work? any pics?

what sort of cost?

so many questions soooo little time Very Happy

regards

Colin

__________________________________
http://www.justgiving.com/team_chaos



co-founder of the famously feared D.C.J.C.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
terence
Guest








PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you all nuts ?

I give you a scenario .......... Hindenburg.


I assume these machines are a bit more sophis, that a 9v battery and a cup of water ??

Intreagued , checked the date no its not 1st April Laughing
Back to top
diff22000
Neil Diamond lookalike


Joined: 30 Jun 2002
Odometer: 9291
Location: Luton Beds



PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

terence mckibben wrote:
Are you all nuts ?

that a 9v battery and a cup of water ??




thats me out then Laughing

__________________________________
http://www.justgiving.com/team_chaos



co-founder of the famously feared D.C.J.C.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rossko
Articulating


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Odometer: 757




PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, basically a cup of water and a 12v battery.

No chance of 'Hindenburg' events because there's no significant storage of hydrogen. The generators make 'Browns gas', a mix of hydrogen and oxygen, and its used as its made.

Claims are made that the 'magic configuration' of each of the many varieties of gear somehow produces monatomic hydrogen gas mix, rather than regular H2 gas, and by a miracle this releases more energy than you put in. Hmm, not convinced at all, but I've never tried it.

Claims are also made that it uses 'spare' electricity from the alternator. That part I know is cobblers, if you take electric from the alternator it loads the engine, ie uses power. If you don't take any electric there's only the windage/bearing losses which you're stuck with anyway. No such thing as 'spare' electric.

Claims are made that ordinary combustion is grossly inefficient, and the miracle gas acts as a catalyst to release more energy from the regular fuel. There may be grains of truth in that, it could work like that on old carb engines.

Also bear in mind that most of the air consumed by an engine is Nitrogen, useless for combustion. Displace some of that useless stuff with a ready-to-burn oxygen/hydrogen mix and you'll get more bang for each puff. The downside is the energy cost to make the gas.... me I believe in the laws of Thermodynamics. "Get owt for nowt, lad"

cheers, Ross K

__________________________________
www.glass-uk.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pope
Just got MTs


Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Odometer: 226
Location: Builth Wells



PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, thank god for that, and here was me thinking there was a world wide energy crisis when all we needed was 12v and a glass of water.
Wonder what the hell Honda was doing spending all those billions of yen developing that hydrogen fuel cell thing, perhaps no-one bothered to tell them it was all so simple!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
terence
Guest








PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the cruel irony here POPE is all you need is a 9v battery and a glass of tap water.

hydrogen and oxgen split between the anode and the cathode..

Cant think what Honda wasted all that money on.

the dodgy bit is compressing and storing it , without another LOS ALOMOS...

eeeek.. look at the lovely mushroom Laughing Cool Laughing Shocked
Back to top
Rossko
Articulating


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Odometer: 757




PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A tank of hydrogen is no more dangerous than any other tank of compressed gas, y'know like the ones used for air suspension and LPG.

Google for 'hydrogen bus fleet', theres a lot around ... because hydrogen suits bus usage patterns. Tank capacity is limited but buses don't need long range. Tank filling is slow but that's not a problem when you can schedule it between routes. In my view the eco-benefits are doubtful - the city streets are nicer because the pollution is made elsewhere at some coal-fired power station instead Smile but its entirely practical.

This run-your-car-on-water business is rather different ; the hydrogen/oxygen mix is generated on the fly and consumed as its made ; no storage. If only there were a source of 'free electric' it'd work rather well !!

cheers, Ross K

__________________________________
www.glass-uk.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
:)
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Odometer: 4337
Location: Norfolk


1995 Land Rover Defender

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The laws of thermodynamics have a term called entropy which is a measure of the amount of energy NOT available to do work. No electrochemical energy transfer can occur at 100% efficiency and this is indeed the case when water is electrolysed into hydrogen and oxygen. At best you will get about 70% of the energy in the electricity turned in chemical energy. Take account the (huge) inefficiency of generating the electricity and that of heat engines when it turns it back into mechanical work the system can not work.

I have seen pseudo scientific articles claiming some improvements by using hydrogen but none have ever stood up to even basic analysis.

Sorry, but unless you have a free source of hydrogen it isn't worth doing.
--
Tim.

__________________________________
-- Timothy Birt --
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Nathaniel
Difflock Royalty


Joined: 13 May 2003
Odometer: 17901
Location: North, North Yorkshire


1979 Suzuki LJ

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could something be driven using the waste heat from the engine? Stirling engine? Generating electricity for the hydrogen generator/traction batteries?
__________________________________
Nat

If You Open Your Mind Too Much Your Brain Will Fall Out
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger eBay Name
:)
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Odometer: 4337
Location: Norfolk


1995 Land Rover Defender

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Possibly, but the only "good" heat source is the exhaust. The potential energy is determined by the difference in temperature between the hot and cold sides, which means the coolant temperature is too low to be particularly useful.

Stirling engines have the potential for high efficiency but the temperature difference needs to be high which requires the use of exotic materials and difficult engineering with regard to expansion and contraction. To get good power to weight the working fluid (usually hydrogen or helium to reduce inertia) needs to be at high pressure further adding to the complexity.

Just as an aside, another possibility is a solid state electrical generator ... using a massive number of thermocouples in series/parallel (you will only get about 5-7% out though)
--
Tim.

__________________________________
-- Timothy Birt --
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pope
Just got MTs


Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Odometer: 226
Location: Builth Wells



PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Entropy is actually the tendency of energy in a CLOSED system to become less capable of providing work, which of course precludes all perpetual motion devices. This liberation of Hydrogen is not a closed system because the water is being added as a fuel plus you are adding your electrical power. However, if a 9v battery, i'm assuming we're talking about the usual little square battery here, could actually provide enough electrical power to convert enough water to supply a significant amount of energy we would not have the desperate thirst for oil that we do.
Energy in/energy out. A 9v battery can only provide 9v worth of shove, however you actually convert that energy into motion, it's not like lighting a fire where the chemical reaction becomes self sustaining as long as you add fuel. As soon as you remove the charge from the water the liberation of your Hydrogen ceases.
Of course, a big 9v battery running perhaps a 1000 amps can provide a very big shove but such a battery with present technology would be unfeasibly heavy and we would bump into the inevitable law of diminishing returns, and, as has been said, where do you get your electricity to charge your battery from?
Any attempt to charge your battery from excess energy generated by your engine would certainly become a closed system and that would bump into good old entropy. No such thing as a free lunch.
Anything that sounds too good to be true almost certainly is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
:)
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Odometer: 4337
Location: Norfolk


1995 Land Rover Defender

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pope wrote:
Entropy is actually the tendency of energy in a CLOSED system to become less capable of providing work, which of course precludes all perpetual motion devices. This liberation of Hydrogen is not a closed system because the water is being added as a fuel plus you are adding your electrical power.
...
and, as has been said, where do you get your electricity to charge your battery from?
Any attempt to charge your battery from excess energy generated by your engine would certainly become a closed system and that would bump into good old entropy. No such thing as a free lunch.
Anything that sounds too good to be true almost certainly is.

The systems I have heard about use the alternator to generate the power (you need a lot to generate a useful amount of hydrogen!) for the electrolysis and since you get water+other stuff out of the exhaust it is as closed a system as you are likely to find.

The bottom line is it won't work.
--
Tim.

__________________________________
-- Timothy Birt --
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rossko
Articulating


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Odometer: 757




PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, there's a couple of people giving it a go, so we should wait for the reports.

I do think there is a chance that streaming in a bit of H/O mix to a 'orrible inefficient engine might improve combustion efficiency enough to be measurable. The more efficient the engine is already, the less to be gained.

Besides, according to all the websites we're ignoring the miraculous properties of monatomic hydrogen Smile

cheers, Ross K

__________________________________
www.glass-uk.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pope
Just got MTs


Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Odometer: 226
Location: Builth Wells



PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Burn efficiency would be far better achieved by adding oxygen not hydrogen, mix it with a bit of nitrogen to stop it getting out of control and voila, massive increases of efficiency out of the same amount of fuel input.
I wonder just what "monatomic" hydrogen is supposed to be? Hydrogen, if my memory of o-level chemistry serves me, has one proton, one neutron and one electron, don't really see how you could get more monatomic than that!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
terence
Guest








PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

O2 would be catastrophiclly unstable , as stated adding % Nitrogen would stabalise it but belive it or not id rather play with hydrogen.

Laughing
Back to top
nivaman
Articulating


Joined: 24 May 2006
Odometer: 929
Location: New Zealand



PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Smile"]
pope wrote:


The bottom line is it won't work.
--
Tim.

Have you tried it before debunking it?.

__________________________________
Lada a little car that takes you far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
:)
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Odometer: 4337
Location: Norfolk


1995 Land Rover Defender

PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nivaman wrote:
Have you tried it before debunking it?.

No, but then I don't need to try and build a perpetual motion machine to know it isn't going to work.

I have seen nothing but pseudo-science from the proponents of "water powered cars". This is so easy to test on a proper test bed engine* that if there was even an inkling of it being effective it would have been documented and fitted aeons ago.

While not wanting to stifle anyone's creative experimentation I would suggest that if your goal is improved fuel economy, then science does not support the theory of generating hydrogen to mix into the intake charge.
--
Tim.

* Academic and research establishments have special engines which can set up with different compression ratios, cam profiles and ignition timing to measure minute changes in performance.

__________________________________
-- Timothy Birt --
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
floyd fan
Just got MTs


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Odometer: 109
Location: Location:Location:



PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I got mine producing gas today, its still on test and I havent connected it to the car yet. I have built it from things I have to hand so its a bit Heath Robinson, but its cost nothing so far. I have used an old water filter housing into which I have put two double helix windings of stainless steel wire. I cant connect it for more than a few seconds at a time as I need to replace the power cable as they are not heavy enough for the Amps it drawing, but when I do connect it to a battery gas starts pouring out straight away and I've had a few nice bangs when I ingnite the gas. It will be intresting to see if I get more MPG, I have a 20yr old 90 TD and I get about 20-25 MPG at the moment. I'll keep you informed of how things go.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
terence
Guest








PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im watching this with Interest and amazment.

Its morris wilks meets George jetson........ amazing


it will still be like driving a BOMB but every pioneer suffered for their cause.

See Curies and Radium.

good luck Laughing
Back to top
Rossko
Articulating


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Odometer: 757




PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For those worrying about the composition of the gases involved here ...

"O2 would be catastrophiclly unstable " - that's funny, air is over 20% oxygen and seems stable enough in general.

Bear in mind the objective here is not to run the engine totally on the products from the electrolyser - we're talking about adding a small percent of H/O mix to the normal air intake on its way to meet the normal fuel in the cylinders.

"mix it with a bit of nitrogen to stop it getting out of control" yup we're using mostly air at 78% Nitrogen so that's covered Smile

Combustion is a complex process. Common sense says if we add H & O in the right proportions they will just recombine to water ... but it is just possible that a slight enrichment of oxygen content and the presence of free hydrogen will do 'something funny' to the usual burning process of the hydrocarbons in the regular fuel, creating unusual intermediate hydrocarbons perhaps. I dunno!! In the end we can only make CO2 and H2O in the usual way, but there is more than one way to get from the starting complex hydrocarbons to that. Going through one chain of reactions cannot release more total energy than going through a different chain, but its theoretically possible that the energy may be in a more useful form - e.g. more pressure, less heat - and so give more miles per gallon. I don't really believe that though Smile

".. wonder just what "monatomic" hydrogen is supposed to be?" Ahh well that's the secret ingredient y'see. Schoolboy chemistry, hydrogen gas is H2 - two H atoms in a molecule as H2. The super special electrolysers are supposed to create a proportion of just H as well as H2, free atoms just looking for work to do ... umm, right. Quite why these free H don't bump into each other and form H2 before even leaving the electrolyser isn't clearly explained.

Adding this hydro/oxygen mix will certainly increase the power output of the engine. What I cannot buy is that increase being even equal to the power drain of running the electrolyser ... quote "need to replace the power cable as they are not heavy enough for the Amps it drawing" Shocked Car alternators run at best about 60% efficient, so for every kW the electrolyser soaks up you'd need to gain 2kW of engine power to break even.

It'll work for some people ; remember that sticking a magnet on the fuel line or lead shot in the tank gives dramatic MPG improvement for some folk too Smile

cheers, Ross K

__________________________________
www.glass-uk.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pope
Just got MTs


Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Odometer: 226
Location: Builth Wells



PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nivaman, you have misquoted me, it was Tim who mentioned "bottom lines", there was a clue there in the signature at the bottom of your quote.
What I actually said was "anything that seems too good to be true almost certainly is"
I do find it hard to see how adding hydrogen is going to improve fuel efficiency, you will get exactly the same energy from your charge of diesel plus an added bang on top from your hydrogen.
I would think that you would need to be fairly careful of pre-ignition and timing issues because it would be a fair bet that Hydrogen is a little more volatile under the extreme pressures and temperature of a diesel combustion chamber. In fact, I would think a petrol engine would be a far safer bet than a diesel, much lower compression ration and much more forgiving of firing imprecision.
My mention of Oxygen mixed with Nitrogen shouldn't have been such a surprise. I was referring in a slightly sarcastic way to a Nitrous oxide system, very simple to set up, kits readily available from Ebay and serious efficiency gains as anyone at Santa Pod would be happy to demonstrate. The trouble comes in using that gain to improve mpg rather than performance.
I am very interested in hearing the results of your experiment, hope it does go well, we can all jump on it if it does!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danno83
Just got MTs


Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Odometer: 146
Location: Brisvegas, sunshine state.



PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got a water4gas system on my niva, and the fuel consumption has gone from 14.3L/100km's to 11.6L/100km's.

and before you ask what else has been done, I disconnected it for a test (to see whether it was actually doing any good) and consumption went back to 14.3L/100km's

I've got mine connected via the vacuum hose into my carbie. seems to do the job well.

__________________________________
peugeot 406 wagon,
Niva 1989 Cabriolet (undergone full rebuild, and absolutely fantastic.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
floyd fan
Just got MTs


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Odometer: 109
Location: Location:Location:



PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Danno83: Interesting, do you have any pics of your set up?

So in English you have gone from about 20MPG to 25MPG thats a 25% increase in mileage. Do you know what output of gas you are getting, ie how many litres per minute. So far I can only get about 350 - 400 mils per minute. I am now working on two cells in series to try and improve the output.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YotaDave
Articulating


Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Odometer: 958
Location: Bristol


1994 Toyota Landcruiser

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nathaniel wrote:
Could something be driven using the waste heat from the engine? Stirling engine? Generating electricity for the hydrogen generator/traction batteries?


The best way I can think of generating electricity from the heat of the engine would be to build a solid state generator using peltiers and attach it to the exhaust. Thinking about it I read an article a few months back where someone was doing this on the exhaust stack on HGVs. They could run the engine without an alternator making the engine much more efficient but if I remember correctly it took about 400 peltiers to generate enough power!........... Cant seem to find the article now though Rolling Eyes .

If a 9v battery produces enough power to run the hydrogen generator the you would probably only need 2 or 3 cheap peltiers to make your generator (I did an experiment a few years ago with a cheap peltier on a camping stove and I got about 4 volts from it). Hey presto free power! Smile

__________________________________
Dave (the Young Fart)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
:)
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Odometer: 4337
Location: Norfolk


1995 Land Rover Defender

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I bit of extra info:
Peltier pumps are usually silicon semiconductor devices and therefore have an upper temperature limit a bit over 200°C, for the hot side - but manufactures often specify quite a bit lower. They could be used with an exhaust as long as there was a mechanism to stop the hot side getting beyond limits.

A similar (but technically different) thermal generator is the to use the thermoelectric voltage of dissimilar metals, as per a thermocouple. You would need to stack a huge number together to generate a useful voltage, but it can be done.

I should also be remembered that they generate power on the basis of a thermal difference, so you need a code side (radiator?) as well as the hot side. Neither are particularly efficient as power generators, but if you are using waste heat then anything is batter than nothing.
--
Tim.

__________________________________
-- Timothy Birt --
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ray_Jnr
Banned!


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Odometer: 4671
Location: The Northeast


1987 Land Rover 90 TD

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

any news on the project? i have stainless wire here and some other bits and bobs but the work has been put back for other jobs that have been more important, im hoping to have a prototype by the end of next week.

if everyone listened to nay sayers then no one would have any fun.

__________________________________
Founder of the Difflock Ginger Goatee Club!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
floyd fan
Just got MTs


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Odometer: 109
Location: Location:Location:



PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm trying to find time to fit mine, just too busy so far.

I'm getting about 400ml per min and have decided to put it on and see if there is any improvement in MPG.

I initially used 1mm SS welding wire, in my second attempt I twisted three Lengths together to give a greater surface area and got a better output.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Difflock Forum Index -> LPG, Bio Diesel and Alternative Fuels All times are GMT - 12 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum
Service Kits

Evo Oils

Specialist Tools

Oil Safe

Facebook

Join our mailing list for upcoming events, special offers, discount coupons and expert advice on the latest 4x4 products!

* indicates required





    
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group