FORUM CLASSIFIEDS DIFFLOCK.com Links & Networks
Forum Homepage
Log in
Profile
Search
Private Messages
Forum Members
Register
Classified Ads
Search Ads
Place New Ad
My ads
Place your classified
ads here for FREE
NB: Adverts placed in the general
forum areas will be deleted
Difflock Homepage
Online Shop
Contact Us
FAQ
Calendar
Garage
Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Advertise With Us - Reach your target market by advertising on the Difflock.com forum.
Click here or call 0845 125 9407


Little HorsePowerMeter
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Difflock Forum Index -> Electrical, Comms and ICE
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2015 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Such a message regarding my two wings. When you are so positioned, with an angle of about 60 degrees, when you measured the exact speed of 4 m / sec wind from a fan, a small windmill starts at high speed ..
four meters per second is 14.4 km / h, it means that we can experiment while riding a bicycle ....

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 5:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[QUOTE=jetman150;11374847]Can you use it to sipe out wind from pressure areas? Say where there is interference, or where you might be able to use low pressure to create differentials for benefit?[/QUOTE]

So somehow luckily it happened, that we have such animations ... I did not have to do a lot of research

[YT]z1QOp_9IWLc[/YT]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1QOp_9IWLc



The wings are slots having a height of 2 mm and a length of 600 mm. or surface fissures through which you get negative pressure to the inside wing is 1200 mm ^ 2. Jarobiac the first model of this wing, I wanted to somehow very simple and cheap execute it. To derive this vacuum, I used a disposable syringe of 20 cc. It inside diameter of 22 mm .. or its surface, is 380 mm ^ 2. As you can see this is the narrowest section, which has to overcome the aerodynamic resistance of the vacuum. This section is very unfavorable, because it is up to 1200/380 = 3.15 lower than the inlet gap .. He should be at least equal to the area of ??the gap, or three such tubing from a syringe .And we have only one wing. Despite this, the fan, which is for the help transition to a higher diameters, ie D = 36 mm or 1017 mm surfaces ^ 2 ie more than two times greater than the tube Inlet, rotates, already at 4 m / sec ..and I think that this it is all very good, despite the primitive prototype, but the first on .. But it proved that way then you should follow..

Andrew:D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I describe a tsunami from the mainland. However, it was not science fiction. This, however, safety of nuclear plants is science fiction. I wonder how many are Indian nuclear power plants is at risk .. a lot a few days longer to collect water ..
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32859353

Andrew Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was at the fair Engine Expo 2015 in Stuttgart, this time to watch, but lacked the funds .. But we have a great relationship with the load Engine of the Year awards in 12 categories in 2015 ... I was just dreaming that in a few years in these all categories , can overcome my concept of four-stroke engines ... it's just that you have to win about 85% of knowledge about the new engine and the old concepts abandon, despite the here they are great ..but worth it .. here reportage of this wonderful celebration ..

http://www.ukipme.com/engineoftheyear/

Download the exclusive online awards magazine here!

http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/64507aa3#/64507aa3/1

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So once again we return to the thermodynamic efficiency new4stroke .. Here the hearing of the efficiency of the charts made for the traditional engine.
https://www.mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e451/e451021.pdf

You can see on the chart with the highest efficiency is low speed engine sea, which is 47%.
My engine as reported above, draws about 360 cc more than the old conventional engine, which did a prototype or 600 ccm ... But this extra volume displacement, is implemented by the system of pistons which rotate two times slower, ie, the force of inertia are four times smaller, because they are dependent upon the square of the rotation. that is, we can just to count the inertial forces relative to the sucked air further. 360 ccm divided by four is going to give us 90 cc. These 90 ccm going to beat the additional forces of inertia (ie a total of friction). But now we have a net profit of 360 ccm minus 90 cc = 270 cc. It is pure extra profit aspirated air, without any mechanical losses already on its construction .. that is entirely theoretical operational efficiency engine so it looks .. traditional engine of 600 cc is 47%, ie 12, 76 ccm is 1% plus an additional 270 cc, which is 270 divided by 12,76 = 21% additional efficiency .. So the total increase the efficiency regarding displacement capacity should be at 47 +21 = 68%. additionally, we can still make a profit energy by stopping propelling Similar systems poppet valves and springs which will have at least the 7% efficiency more .. So, the total physical ability of such an engine 68% + 7% = ~ 75% .

ie it is to increase efficiency, which can not be subject to discussion.

If we add all the above mentioned advantages, no such low temperature in the combustion chamber, the combustion speed, and more, which can contribute to higher efficiency even further by around 5% this will give us the final number of efficiency of up to 80% .....
Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Windmills are good, but you need a wind to their work ...
But here the way we can, even in a closed room, well, for instance in the basement of the house, "produce wind" .. Just, the Starting a device, manually, to the speed of 18 m / sec..To are few, it is 1 turn per second.
I've been to all these wings Windmill Red Baron, will operate the wind, at the speed of 18 m / sec ..
If we consider, in simulator NASA and the effect of "spoon" is theoretically You will receive an strength of resistance to "lift force" (vacuum). and is about 15 times less ..
So the resistance force, it is only around 6% received "lift force"
I think that even with a very negligent and mismanagement execution of such a machine, it will propel herself after the first start-up .. And we should still get some electricity .. Case, jet just how much ..




description:



Vane drive:






http://www.new4stroke.com/treadmill.mp4

or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mt1DEHlZ0Kc


Regards Andrew Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We must take care to harmful aerodynamic resistances as low as possible ..
Because, after all, and two revolutions per second can turn the wings .. It is 120 km / h .. Pretty on the wind.
This cover should be good.



Can of some use ..

http://enu.kz/repository/2010/AIAA-2010-1007.pdf

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the vacuum looks like the animation spoon wings, it is seen that it has a range before the profile wings. Perhaps the the vacuum will suck the new air between the wings and hence a marked decrease their frontal resistance ..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1QOp_9IWLc&feature=youtu.be


Here a version with a large vane Engines .. I do not know yet what dimensions it should be .. Maybe even a big and then it will be adjusted to the amount and pressure created by the wings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_So_SOZUlI

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once upon a time there was no internet .. Even with the video was difficult .. only movies .. I have survived such films showing such beautiful cars with large wings .. I once suggested that such a wing but the bulge facing down ..but not all of it like .. it turned out that such huge wings were already in use .. Now can a wing of such large dimensions but the double - spoon effect .. interesting how many vacuum that could, if NACA-profile Felix apply any .. maybe above a certain speed .. .....







Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yesterday marked the 70th anniversary of explosion atomic bomb in Nagasaki. the first theoretical founder Joseph Rotblat it was ..

https://www.wagingpeace.org/tag/joseph-rotblat/

quoted below what was his attitude to scientific discoveries:

"Hind al. [16] pointed out that the unpredictability switched
petent research makes such a project
difficult, if at all possible. But such a project
of it becomes meaningful if based on ethical principles.
Rotblat was of the opinion that the foundations of ethics should form
part of the training of all scientists. He wanted,
that universities have adopted some sort of cited above
oaths, and to students of natural filed
such a vow when finish their studies, and listened to lectures
on the ethical aspects of science. Relying on his conscience
and the good will of individual scientists not in itself
It will be sufficient, since the units are often unreliable.
Therefore called for the establishment of a number of ethics committees,
which might consider science projects that may affect
human life, some kind of medical committees
ethical. Consent ethics of such a committee would be required
for funding a particular direction of research.
In later life, Rotblat opposed
research conducted in secret, which is often
in the case of government research and industrial applications. He believed
that new knowledge to be shared. He moved a problem
associated with the commercialization of research, since many studies
carried out in universities were funded
from commercial sources. This could influence the direction
study, put at risk the ethical problems and increase the mystery.
He also began to hate the patenting of results
research, because in his opinion, knowledge should be
available for free. But scientists themselves often impose secrecy.
because they want to keep other scholars in the dark
until publication, because a person who
First it publishes, often gets awards and honors.
These views Rotblat that come with early stages
his career and matured over a lifetime, are a bit naive,
because competition, secrecy
and commercialization are part of learning. He simply wanted
resist these pressures "

I like it..

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here this car..



Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[QUOTE=Thepanzerfuhrer;32937258]If I employed this wing technique on say a convertible mustang, how much reduction could I expect in my corrected et?[/QUOTE]

for it is not such a simple thing .. My drawing is only a theory, and even to good its use probably still need many experiences .. It's like a first flight .. Here we see that one of the first aircraft was driven by the wheel to become independent by the wind .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustave_Whitehead
Now that the simulator airfoil from NASA perfectly we can see that even minimal changes in some parameters, the cause, the whole project can not go wrong .. You can discern that the value of lifting force to the resistance can take very extreme value. THEREFORE should be chosen carefully all the values. RELATIONSHIP TO RESISTANCE to the lift of WAS AS 1: 10 ..
For the time being we do not have a simulator to "spoon effect", the distance and angle of attack of wings .. But we can assume based on experience, that it will have a value, after careful about choosing the least 3 times larger than the two single wing, that is, if we simulator one wing lift 37 pounds is two give us 74 pounds .. multiply it by spoon effect. that is, times 3, which gives us 222 pounds of force "propellants", in relation to the resistance, which is 7.4 pounds ... So theoretical gain is about 30 times .. Now, from our skills and experience will depend on how much practically with the profit we will they could utilize to drive a car .. it is a very big number, and even if almost ten times we reduce it, it will be us coefficient 3, for a clean drive a car .. so it all depends on how it practically execute ..



Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, for flying Dedalus human needs only 200 watts of power .. I wonder how many need to of going by car ..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Daedalus


Here the newest model .. Smile




Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is nice to finally see how it works in practice my idea, published in 2009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA_UgVm9bvU

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nightbar
Difflock Royalty


Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Odometer: 20799
Location: In a state of anticipation...


1999 Land Rover Defender

PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still need to read this read in its entirety Cool
__________________________________
The ex-Difflock Ambassador to Naples, Sir Nightbar DCJC DFS and 2 bars.

Plant a tree for the Difflock 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger Skype NameeBay Name
jojo
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Odometer: 5422




PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nightbar wrote:
I still need to read this read in its entirety Cool


I would encourage you to do so and check some of his maths while you are at it where I think you will find that there is a serious cock-up in the drag coefficient and exponentiation figures. Also I either missed or nodded off before I got to the bit about stability of the vehicle at the speeds it may need to run at.

J
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Winnet
Difflock Royalty


Joined: 03 Dec 2003
Odometer: 14725
Location: Aberdeen


1985 Land Rover

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love this thread, don't understand much of it admittedly.

G.

__________________________________
Bored......

All these questions and more after the tea break.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger Skype Name
Xpajun
Mud Obsessed


Joined: 22 Sep 2008
Odometer: 3245



1988 Mitsubishi Shogun

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Winnet wrote:
I love this thread, don't understand much of it admittedly.

G.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website eBay Name
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And you know what these wings including my project still can be used? not even suppose ...:rolleyes:

This is EXHAUST. .. :p

Thus, the negative pressure is created dam that will serve to suck exhaust gas from the engine .. vacuum will remain on throughout the exhaust pipe .. will suck exhaust lot better than they do, competitive exhaust pipe curled in a "sausage" ...
And by the way a negative pressure can be so great that at some considerable speed, you can turn off the ignition .. :p and cut off the supply of fuel .. :p interesting at what it will speed ..:rolleyes:

and even before up to speed, it also can underpressure to run a turbine from the exhaust and nwtedy that the system does not have to be connected ..

Well, not to mention the alternator, which also would say fueled rotary vane pump on the vacuum ...

Yes, if so, a pair of wings spoon should be at the back of the car ....Very Happy




Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So now even a version
So here the animation ramjet engines between the wings in a spoon effect, which is about 9 times increase input speed .. Pipes of course without turbines, such as SR 71, and, so to eye with 250 MW of getting So, yes, the set of a diameter of 30 meters, having the 250 MW of power, he would have 12 pieces of such pipes since SR71, visible starter pneumatic boot, and the number 2 units would give so much energy around, a small nuclear power plant Only with the size of the power plant, even coal, consumed for own use 50 MW (high pressure pumps, blowers and fans, etc.). Here only the minimum energy for the fuel supply system, expressed in kilowatts ..
And the cost of investment that air football field, probably will be significantly smaller.
It's to improve the imagination, what I'm saying.
Well, here we have any fuel - coal dust, gas, oil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u7dzn75LHo&feature=youtu.be

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wuzak, on 12 Oct 2015 - 03:07, said:
The SR-71 had turbojets, not ramjets.

So yes, engines SR71, a combined cycle engines .. to take-off and less than one Mach a turbine engine plays an essential role, but above the speed second element of this combination, which is a ram-jet engine (the tube that flows air) begins to play a dominant role speeds above Mach 3, giving it 82% of the total during what has at its disposal the plane. that is, if we gave up at that speed at all of the turbine engine, this string would only decreased by 18%. I think that on threads loss in our application we can afford and get rid of at all of this very complicated and expensive engine components SR 71. we are left only ram-jet, and he will be with an efficiency of about 95% at the speed .This is written in the NASA study concerning the second combined cycle Ramjet engine of the rocket engine .. rocket engine ..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SR71_J58_Engi...flow_Patterns.svg

http://www.nowy4suw.republika.pl/sr71%20naped.pdf

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nas...v/20110013567.pdf

https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/185.../aiaa_96-2688.pdf

But for our purposes of energy production should be enough speed less than 1 mach. Well, here the helicopter, which must be produced from 100KW power to fly ..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evjd49r52tg&feature=youtu.be

Except that I would not advise that a helicopter to fly .. but the current can do safely :rolleyes:

[img]https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xat1/v/t1.0-9/11215866_10207957723565334_6457193087626045051_n.jpg?oh=778069d833a3c1a5ca75548f954a3755&oe=5685A839[/img]

[img]https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-0/p180x540/12046719_10207957718205200_8580909734561461941_n.jpg?oh=a15aab0d9320dc31665d424a2109ca0b&oe=56CA6258[/img]


Andrew
Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So come on ramjet engine, such as the SR 71 .. which drives the generator on a treadmill, and give you the energy ... but when we have a stream of departing gases, after the addition of neodymium magnets can be good even with these tubes directly receive electrical energy generated MHD generator .. no as shown in the figure also how we will burn pulverized coal .. no but the engine is a framework is the same as scram jet, only at lower speeds. In 2015 Tokyo was developed in the engine scram is that with the help produced on the basis of MHD power also speeds up the exhaust gases on the MHD reverse. We need to get all our MHD mounted on the framework jet engine gave only electricity .. extra for electricity from the generator to the axis of the device .. but that's not all we can with the energy produced in this way receive .. Because the device is going to rotate in a circle with a diameter of 30 m, then we can all thermal energy from the combustion of fuel to pick up, building a 35-meter housing for the device. And WHOLE heat generated can pick up with the aid of heat recovery units (coolers or tubes such as in a steam boiler) and use it, or even to produce additional power, or (i) for heating .. This time none have not wasted










Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here the newest model of the wind my car .. Only cosmetic changes on the outside .. Smile



But inside the revolution ..
I present two screenshots of the simulator NASA airfoil and it is clear that at different angle of attack with a symmetrical profile, receive different values ??of lift .. From negative to positive .. or 160 KG positive, or 160 kg (320 lbs) negative (downward pushing sash) when changing the angle of attack of 30 degrees .. and dimensions of the wings 2, 5 meters square at a speed of 100 km / h (60 miles)






Well, this wing of their forces can drive the crankshaft directly ..
Here, the animation .. The angle of attack of the wing can change either electrically or mechanically (cam) There is no need for this high energy ..

https://youtu.be/evC5y0wgOVM

Well needless to say that such a system also can work at creating their own wind ... ..

I had to publish it on Santa Claus, but that the climate summit a little hurried me .. Because after what happened there in May too tired and negotiate, as you no longer need .. maybe someone out there will send a telegram?:rolleyes:


Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mike328
Articulating


Joined: 10 Dec 2014
Odometer: 793
Location: Suffolk!



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

so the NASA simulation shows you've got 226lb of drag and 1lb of lift at the back of the car?

but the picture of your car shows two upswept wings both that will produce lift?

How will either help a traditional car?

Are you trying to invent a perpetual motion machine with the idea of making it drive an axle or create a pressure pushing the car forwards?


Is this clearly too clever for me Confused

__________________________________
Snap On: Turning drawers into status symbols since 1920.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 4:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This year, with best wishes for Christmas to all something more pleasant ..

I designed a completely new an amplifier for guitarists. Of course, for lamps, but with a completely has not used elements .. I made a prototype amplifier. Well, I think that I managed to get fairly good sound. An amplifier is built on 4 x EL34 and attached to the speaker box with two Celestion G12M .Here movie, from a small club (30 persons) in Krakow, where my friend Leszek playing for the first time in my amplifier. After a concert gave very positive opinions about the brand new, my tube amp design .. Was this opinion was correct, can you assess yourself listening as playing solo on the film of this show ... Smile

https://youtu.be/JncURyq77sM


And here the Silent Nigt with Christmas wishes for all ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_PfwVNmckc

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, maybe you need to start from the simple structure ... Here a tandem bike in which the other in the rear never laze will not be ....
The experience you need to slowly gather .. the Wright brothers' first flight at the time, only 278 meters flew his machine ..



Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is clear evidence that that there are amplifiers, which are able to significantly strengthen, without any additional energy absorbed from the outside ...

https://www.facebook.com/LaMusique/videos/10152736333573937/

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, sometimes you can use the models made by others, and do not spend money on their models. Here you can see very well that this model boats, capable of flowing even into the wind .. But demonstrator, not even suppose that, in this way, is also a way to produce wind, because the boat is sailing faster and for this reason, the wind acting on the windmill you will be getting stronger ... if you are a boat tied to a string to floating around, it will float forever ... .. unless my eyes deceive me ..: .. of course my solution, instead of the classic windmill, windmill will be Red Baron version double teaspoon, which closed Roots and the propeller will power.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_emb...amp;v=8Rw_qJytbG8



Andrew Very Happy Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2016 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here a link for professionals, which, in one place trying to give some knowledge about my engine. Thinking in terms of only heat the internal combustion engine and associated only with the efficiency of the internal combustion engine is a serious limitation of understanding of the internal combustion engine .. As described, the efficiency of the internal combustion engine, Primarily a depends on the efficiency to overcome the forces of inertia. Generally, twice heavier engine of the same displacement, will be much less efficient, its lighter version and the consequent efficiencies, have nothing to do with the heat .. Because overcome the forces of inertia does not cause any increase or loss heat .. So thinking only categories that everything can be reduced to the category of heat is a big mistake, because overcoming inertia can not "force" reduced to the category of heat.

http://forum.engine-research.com/index.php?PHPS...6p7&board=4.0

Andrew Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feliks
Just got MTs


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Odometer: 476




PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here the wing crank, because the wind can produce ourselves, when we want and where we want .. remember the carousel, like hair blowing in the wind, when it was going on?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey9W39NDXx0&feature=youtu.be



Andrew
Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Difflock Forum Index -> Electrical, Comms and ICE All times are GMT - 12 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 13 of 18

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum
Evo Oils

Service Kits

Oil Safe

Facebook

Specialist Tools

Join our mailing list for upcoming events, special offers, discount coupons and expert advice on the latest 4x4 products!

* indicates required





    
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group