View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Turnip Just got MTs
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Odometer: 192 Location: Gloucestershire
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:43 am Post subject: Max side slope?
|
|
|
Been doing a bit of steep slope logging with the Turnip wagon and I was wondering if anyone has seen published angles for the Mog 404?
I know my landrover is meant to be good for 45 degrees before you hit a rabbit hole and turns turtle!
I reckon I get to about 30 before I bottle! I know that it is all dependent on body styles and loads etc - but it would be nice to know what the factory said?
__________________________________ Never mistake the edge of your rut for the horizon......... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
dreamdrive Gate Opener
Joined: 11 Nov 2006 Odometer: 27 Location: Chichester
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:38 pm Post subject: side slopes
|
|
|
Taken from wikipedia.....
Unimog 404
introduced: 1955
discontinued: 1980
width: 2130 mm (84 in)
length: 4900 mm
height: 2190 mm (86 in), cab height: 1600 mm (63 in)
cargo bed: 3000 by 2000 mm (118 by 78 in), 2130 by 2080 mm (84 by 82 in) with double-cab
wheelbase: 2900 mm (114 in)
turning radius: 13 m (42.6 ft)
empty weight: 2900 kg (6390 lb)
gross weight: 4400 kg (9700 lb)
tires: 10.5 x 20 (DOT)
fuel: 2 x 60-litre (15.9 US gal)
ground clearance: 400 mm (15.7 in)
fording (w/o equipment): 800 mm (31.5 in)
traverse angle
on a side slope: 42 degrees
approach: 45 degrees
departure: 46 degrees
climb: 70% grade
descent: 90% grade
average fuel consumption (gasoline): 10–14 mpg (US) (24–17 L/100 km)
engine: 2.2-litre straight 6 SOHC (Mercedes Benz M180) 80 HP (60 kW)
Shielded Distributor Ignition, 24 Volt Electrical System
2 Barrel Zenith NDIX-32 Carburetor
transmission gearing
forward: 14.93/8.23/4.47/2.46/1.52/1.0
reverse: 20.12/11.09
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anthony BathMat Rushton Mud Obsessed
Joined: 05 Jul 2005 Odometer: 3749 Location: Wigan Near Manc
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:48 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i know dave has pushed his hard....
__________________________________ D6 - Remember Folks, It Takes 8 Hours To Take A Front Diff Out On A 90...The Engine Has To Come Out As Well!
D8 - Skinny Dipping At D8 - Chief ****-Inist!
D9 I Pulled Pussy At D9 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Turnip Just got MTs
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Odometer: 192 Location: Gloucestershire
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:36 am Post subject: Max side slope?
|
|
|
Thanks for that Tobes - i suppose I could have looked at Wikapedia myself!!
42 degrees is a helluva side slope isn't it? I think I would cop out long before that! As it was I had a good ton of Maple rings on board and the wheels were side slipping towards the river on wet grass at about a tyre width per rotation - brown trouser experience!
__________________________________ Never mistake the edge of your rut for the horizon......... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shaggy Articulating
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Odometer: 560 Location: Manchester, UK
1961 Mercedes-Benz Unimog 404 Doka
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:39 am Post subject:
|
|
|
When we had the crappy old bar tyres on, I pulled up on the side of a grassy hill, and it just carried on sliding sideways down the hill.
I jumped out! I think we used daves as an anchor to drive it back up.
jim
__________________________________ Bright Orange Unimog 404 DoKa
www.foodfight.org.uk/mog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
minimog Off-Road Guru
Joined: 25 Nov 2004 Odometer: 1700
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:23 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
just as a matter of interest did you have you difflocks engaged when on the side slope because by the nature of both wheels beeing locked together it would drag you down the sideslope with what ever tyres you had on
__________________________________ WHAT YOUR ASKED WHEN YOU OWN A MOG
"why have you put a merc star on that"
UNIMOG MOTTO
"IF IT CARNT BE FIXED WITH A BIG HAMMER"
IT MUST BE AN ELECTRICAL FAULT" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shaggy Articulating
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Odometer: 560 Location: Manchester, UK
1961 Mercedes-Benz Unimog 404 Doka
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:30 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I can't remember, but it also did it after it _should_ have stopped!
__________________________________ Bright Orange Unimog 404 DoKa
www.foodfight.org.uk/mog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Turnip Just got MTs
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Odometer: 192 Location: Gloucestershire
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:40 pm Post subject: Max side slope?
|
|
|
Interesting comment that Minimog - I can see your logic. I must try it without the locks and see what happens? I had the rear in and the front open - may be better to leave them both open?
__________________________________ Never mistake the edge of your rut for the horizon......... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wangaroo Just got MTs
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Odometer: 152 Location: in deep doo doo
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:13 am Post subject: Re: side slopes
|
|
|
Tobes wrote: | Taken from wikipedia.....
turning radius: 13 m (42.6 ft)
traverse angle
on a side slope: 42 degrees
climb: 70% grade
descent: 90% grade
|
May I as a Wannabe Mog owner offer my 2 pence worth?
I don't know how much faith I would place on the accuracy of the above figures. For example Turning radius of 42.6ft would give a turning circle of an outrageous 85.2 ft,! double that of a 110 Defender?
Gradient climb angle of 70% seems very conservative for a Mog, especially when 100% represents 45 degrees,and my old series 2 LandRover owners manual claims a fully laden gradient climbing ability of over 45 degrees.
Remember that due to propshaft torque reaction a vehicle will overturn more easily on a sideslope with the drivers side down than passenger side down, particularly when a lot of torque is being used, such as dragging logs around etc. I've rolled LandRovers on far shallower sideslopes than the published 45 degree maximum due to propshaft torque reaction.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Turnip Just got MTs
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Odometer: 192 Location: Gloucestershire
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:40 am Post subject: max side slope?
|
|
|
Mmm that's going to take some serious thinking about! On the Mog I'm not even sure which way the propshaft rotates! Because it has hub reduction boxes in the portal axles I know the half shafts go backwards. I will have to look at the diff and see which way the prop turns!
The other head scratcher is what effect the torque tube would have on this effect - there will be a torque reaction, but how is it resolved? Also does the torque reaction on the front axle work opposite to the rear?
So many questions!
__________________________________ Never mistake the edge of your rut for the horizon......... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
shaggy Articulating
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Odometer: 560 Location: Manchester, UK
1961 Mercedes-Benz Unimog 404 Doka
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:08 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
The portals half the torque reaction, and the big ball and socket is where it would try and turn. It won't stop it, but friction must minimise it. Say 1/4 of the effect overall?
Have a look at this -
What's on top makes a huge difference. The rollcage on Ingrid hasn't made it fell different, but when we put the harvey frost crane in its new high position it raises the CoG frighteningly.
jim
__________________________________ Bright Orange Unimog 404 DoKa
www.foodfight.org.uk/mog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wangaroo Just got MTs
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Odometer: 152 Location: in deep doo doo
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:24 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
The propshafts rotate in the same direction as on conventional vehicles, just the diffs are inverted. Portals in themselves make no difference to propshaft torque, but overall final drive gear ratio does. For example a 7:1 crownwheel and pinion require only half the propshaft torque of a 3.5 crown wheel and pinion for a given amount of torque at the wheels . Mogs generally have larger diameter wheels than typical LandRover type vehicles. these require a little more propshaft torque to turn. so the effect is much higher than a 1/4, actually more than half.
As stated earlier a vehicle can be induced to roll at a much shallower angle that its static rollover angle due to propshaft torque when it is right hand down. Conversely propshaft torque can be used so that a steeper than rated side slope can be crossed when the vehicle is left hand down as long as power and traction is maintained. If traction is lost during the crossing the stabilising effect of prophaft torque is also lost and the truck will fall over. I have used this effect to advantage on quie a few occasions, but have also come unstuck once or twice when traction was lost or the engine cut out before completing the crossing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stuvy Winch Assistant
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Odometer: 82 Location: Bedfordshire
1994 Land Rover Discovery
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
hi guys, just reading this post, id never thought of the side pull effect on prop shafts before, and i bet it certainly is a case of trial and error
__________________________________ Discovery S1 gone but sorely missed!
58 Simoncelli |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|